![]()
HCS612
Forage Crops
Animal Intake
![]()
![]() |
Introduction |
| Measurement of animal intake | |
| Forage effects on intake |
Introduction (see text pg 85-87)
| Why? animal intake is the key determinant of production | |
|
Animal intake can be explicitly controlled by the pasture allowance (handout pg 252) |
|
| Example A field has a mass of 4000 kgDM/ha If it is grazed for 2 days to a residual mass of 1000 kgDM/ha (75% utilization) by 100 cows, the animal intake will be: (4000-1000)/100/2 = 15 kgDM/cow/day |
|
Forage
Effects on Animal Intake
|
Pasture mass (handout fig 10.2). Grazing typically removes 33-50% of the pasture height. More height = more intake | |
|
Maximum intake typically occurs at a pasture mass of 2200-3600 kgDM/ha | |
|
Maximum intake for sheep is at a much lower height (6-12 cm) (handout pg 278) than for cattle (15-20 cm) (handout pg 266) | |
|
Pasture
quality (protein has little effect on intake, digestibility/fiber/NDF
reduce intake) (text fig 6.1) | |
|
Particle
size (rate of passage) (text pg 93) | |
|
Sward structure the density of forage (kg/m³) will influence intake | |
|
Leaf:stem
ratio stem reduces intake | |
|
High moisture reduces intake |
Forage
Species Effects on Animal Intake
|
Species effects related to physical and chemical characteristics | |
|
Legumes have higher intake than forages because they have high density, high digestibility, less fiber, small particle size | |
|
Ryegrass has greater intake than tall fescue | |
|
|
|
Palatability
the preference animals have for a forage when they are offered
a choice (text pg 87) | |
|
The effect of palatability on intake when animals have no choice is variable depending on what was the basis of the differentiation but usually disappears |
![]()
![]()
|
|
Copyright © The Ohio State University |